1:109:381 - Revision history

10.5.32.73 at 17:23, 28 August 2024

2024-08-28T17:23:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 28 August 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Your fav of the 18th ult. is recd		Your fav of the 18th ult. is recd

	I regret that you have not considered it safe, to advise the payment of more than $35.000. on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contractors did not suppose that under any circumstances more than $10.000 would be ~~retianed~~, as the cost of the subsisting the Indians for one ~~yaer~~ will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is proper that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the contract, to <s>fulfil</s> secure its fulfilments.--a large amount cannot be withheld, in justice to the enterprising contractors and other parties concerned. The contractors are under heavy liability incurred in effecting the emigration which $35.000, after deducting the $15.000 to be recd by Mr. Peebles, will not meet.		I regret that you have not considered it safe, to advise the payment of more than $35.000. on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contractors did not suppose that under any circumstances more than $10.000 would be retained, as the cost of the subsisting the Indians for one year will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is proper that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the contract, to <s>fulfil</s> secure its fulfilments.--a large amount cannot be withheld, in justice to the enterprising contractors and other parties concerned. The contractors are under heavy liability incurred in effecting the emigration which $35.000, after deducting the $15.000 to be recd by Mr. Peebles, will not meet.

	Under these circumstances, I trust that you will deem it not inconsistent with your duty to the Government to advise the payment of a much larger sum than the one named.		Under these circumstances, I trust that you will deem it not inconsistent with your duty to the Government to advise the payment of a much larger sum than the one named.

10.5.32.73 at 17:20, 28 August 2024

2024-08-28T17:20:49Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Branch<illegible>
+Branch Bank Fort Wayne<br>
-January 7, 1847
+Jany 7, 1847
-Your fan of the 18th. it is really urgent that you have not considered it safer, to advise the payment of more than $35000 on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contract did not dapper that under any circumstances more than $10000 would be retained, as the cost of <illegible> the Indians for one year will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is <illegible> that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the
+Dr Sir

Dorngj at 03:14, 6 May 2021

2021-05-06T03:14:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 5 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Branch<illegible>		Branch<illegible>
	January 1847		January 7, 1847
	Your fan of the 18th. It is ~~<illegible>~~ that you have ~~<illegible>~~
	~~<illegible> It is~~ safer, to ~~a <illegible>~~ the ~~<illegible>~~ of more than $35000. In the <illegible> for ~~the~~ <illegible> of the ~~Miamis. The~~		Your fan of the 18th. it is really urgent that you have not considered it safer, to advise the payment of more than $35000 on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contract did not dapper that under any circumstances more than $10000 would be retained, as the cost of <illegible> the Indians for one year will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is <illegible> that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the

Dorngj at 22:04, 5 May 2021

2021-05-05T22:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 5 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Branch<illegible>
	January 1847		January 1847
			Your fan of the 18th. It is <illegible> that you have <illegible>
			<illegible> It is safer, to a <illegible> the <illegible> of more than $35000. In the <illegible> for the <illegible> of the Miamis. The

Dorngj: Created page with "January 1847"

2021-05-04T15:26:52Z

Created page with "January 1847"

New page

January 1847