https://myaamiaremoval.lib.miamioh.edu/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=1%3A55%3A173 2026-08-18T05:53:59Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.8 https://myaamiaremoval.lib.miamioh.edu/wiki/index.php?title=1:55:173&diff=907&oldid=prev 2024-08-21T14:06:17Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:06, 21 August 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>unreasonably <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> [illegible] </del>I must be <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">permittance [illegible] thanks. Refusing [illegible] </del>aid in settling their business at <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">this </del>request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like an enemy from them, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">age </del>worse, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>if they [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</del>] any natural [illegible] is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">leasing </del>before them business <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in arrogance</del>? So far from aiding <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">them </del>peacable removal, by guiding <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible</del>] <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">them </del>just wishes + thereby withdrawing all obstacles in the way of emigration. The [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</del>] increases the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">affirmation </del>+ imitates an already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily removed by the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] conforming </del>to law + with a rigid regard to justice. Why then the determined refusal to do it? Can it be possible that "force"  is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a thing [illegible] </del>be a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>reliable resort for Gov. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>with a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fable </del>half <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>nation of Indians than <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] right </del>+ <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>? A sincere desire to have an administration which, as an <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>, in 1844. I [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</del>] would be governed in all <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>by a determination to exact <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>from all, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] is </del>to all + <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">them </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] when a [illegible] </del>upon a course which will be <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>as <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>makes <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] which </del>from other <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">with </ins>unreasonably<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, as </ins>I must be <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">permitted to think, refusing to </ins>aid in settling their business at <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">their </ins>request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like an enemy from them, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[or?] </ins>worse, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">driven from their lands &amp; their homes, </ins>if they [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illeg</ins>] any natural [illegible] is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">leaving </ins>before them business <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">is arranged</ins>? So far from aiding <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">their </ins>peacable removal, by <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[</ins>guiding <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">to?</ins>] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">their </ins>just wishes + thereby withdrawing <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;u&gt;</ins>all<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;/u&gt; </ins>obstacles in the way of emigration. The [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Department?</ins>] increases the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">difficulties </ins>+ imitates an already dissatisfied people by threat of "force<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">.</ins>" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily removed by the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Sup&lt;sup&gt;t&lt;/sup&gt; in strict conformity </ins>to law + with a rigid regard to justice. Why then the determined refusal to do it? Can it be possible that "force"  is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">thought to </ins>be a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">more </ins>reliable resort for Gov. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in its intercourse </ins>with a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">feeble </ins>half <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> civilized </ins>nation of Indians than <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">rights </ins>+ <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">justice</ins>? A sincere desire to have an administration which, as an <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Elector</ins>, in 1844. I [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">believed?</ins>] would be governed in all <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">its acts </ins>by a determination to exact <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">justice </ins>from all, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mete it </ins>to all + <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">oppress none</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">shun </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">odium consequent </ins>upon a course which will be <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">stigmatized </ins>as <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">oppressive &amp; iniquitous, </ins>makes <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">me, aside </ins>from other <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">considerations, anxious to see</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Shriver.48 https://myaamiaremoval.lib.miamioh.edu/wiki/index.php?title=1:55:173&diff=471&oldid=prev 2021-05-04T14:57:30Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:57, 4 May 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[illegible] unreasonably  [illegible] must be permittance <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">is </del>thanks. [illegible] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>from them [illegible] if they [illegible] natural [illegible] is leasing before them business <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>? So far from aiding them <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>removal, by [illegible] <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">is </del>them just wishes<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">. I </del>thereby withdrawing all <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>in the way of emigration. The [illegible] the affirmation <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [illegible] conforming to law <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and </del>with a rigid <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>. Why then the determined refusal <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible]</del>? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [illegible] be a [illegible] reliable resort for [illegible] with a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>half [illegible] nation of Indians [illegible] right <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">of </del>[illegible]? <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </del>desire to have an <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] nation </del>which, as an [illegible], in 1844. I [illegible] would be governed in all [illegible] by a determination to exact [illegible] from all, [illegible] is to all<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">. I </del>[illegible], them the [illegible] when a [illegible] which will be [illegible] as [illegible] makes [illegible] which from other [illegible]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[illegible] unreasonably  [illegible] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">I </ins>must be permittance <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[illegible] </ins>thanks. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Refusing </ins>[illegible] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">aid in settling their business </ins>at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">an enemy </ins>from them<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, age worse, </ins>[illegible] if they [illegible] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">any </ins>natural [illegible] is leasing before them business <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in arrogance</ins>? So far from aiding them <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">peacable </ins>removal, by <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">guiding </ins>[illegible] them just wishes <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">+ </ins>thereby withdrawing all <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">obstacles </ins>in the way of emigration. The [illegible] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">increases </ins>the affirmation <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">+ imitates an </ins>already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">removed by the </ins>[illegible] conforming to law <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">+ </ins>with a rigid <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">regard </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">justice</ins>. Why then the determined refusal <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">to do it</ins>? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [illegible] be a [illegible] reliable resort for <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Gov. </ins>[illegible] with a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fable </ins>half [illegible] nation of Indians <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">than </ins>[illegible] right <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">+ </ins>[illegible]? <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">A sincere </ins>desire to have an <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">administration </ins>which, as an [illegible], in 1844. I [illegible] would be governed in all [illegible] by a determination to exact [illegible] from all, [illegible] is to all <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">+ </ins>[illegible], them the [illegible] when a [illegible] <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">upon a course </ins>which will be [illegible] as [illegible] makes [illegible] which from other [illegible]</div></td></tr> </table>

Gerberlb https://myaamiaremoval.lib.miamioh.edu/wiki/index.php?title=1:55:173&diff=357&oldid=prev 2021-04-30T02:40:13Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 22:40, 29 April 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] unreasonably  [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] must be permittance is thanks. [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] from them [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] if they [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] natural [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] is leasing before them business [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>]? So far from aiding them [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] removal, by [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] is them just wishes. I thereby withdrawing all [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] in the way of emigration. The [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] the affirmation [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] conforming to law and with a rigid [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] to [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>]. Why then the determined refusal [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>]? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] be a [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] reliable resort for [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] with a [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] half [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] nation of Indians [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] right of [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>]? [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] desire to have an [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] nation which, as an [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>], in 1844. I [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] would be governed in all [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] by a determination to exact [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] from all, [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] is to all. I [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>], them the [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] when a [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] which will be [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] as [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] makes [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>] which from other [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unintelligible</del>]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] unreasonably  [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] must be permittance is thanks. [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] from them [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] if they [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] natural [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] is leasing before them business [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>]? So far from aiding them [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] removal, by [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] is them just wishes. I thereby withdrawing all [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] in the way of emigration. The [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] the affirmation [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] conforming to law and with a rigid [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] to [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>]. Why then the determined refusal [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>]? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] be a [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] reliable resort for [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] with a [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] half [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] nation of Indians [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] right of [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>]? [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] desire to have an [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] nation which, as an [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>], in 1844. I [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] would be governed in all [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] by a determination to exact [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] from all, [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] is to all. I [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>], them the [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] when a [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] which will be [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] as [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] makes [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>] which from other [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">illegible</ins>]</div></td></tr> </table>

Gerberlb https://myaamiaremoval.lib.miamioh.edu/wiki/index.php?title=1:55:173&diff=320&oldid=prev 2021-04-29T02:15:17Z

<p>Created page with &quot;[unintelligible] unreasonably [unintelligible] must be permittance is thanks. [unintelligible] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [uninte...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>[unintelligible] unreasonably [unintelligible] must be permittance is thanks. [unintelligible] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [unintelligible] from them [unintelligible] if they [unintelligible] natural [unintelligible] is leasing before them business [unintelligible]? So far from aiding them [unintelligible] removal, by [unintelligible] is them just wishes. I thereby withdrawing all [unintelligible] in the way of emigration. The [unintelligible] the affirmation [unintelligible] already dissatisfied people by threat of &quot;force&quot; There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [unintelligible] conforming to law and with a rigid [unintelligible] to [unintelligible]. Why then the determined refusal [unintelligible]? Can it be possible that &quot;force&quot; is a thing [unintelligible] be a [unintelligible] reliable resort for [unintelligible] with a [unintelligible] half [unintelligible] nation of Indians [unintelligible] right of [unintelligible]? [unintelligible] desire to have an [unintelligible] nation which, as an [unintelligible], in 1844. I [unintelligible] would be governed in all [unintelligible] by a determination to exact [unintelligible] from all, [unintelligible] is to all. I [unintelligible], them the [unintelligible] when a [unintelligible] which will be [unintelligible] as [unintelligible] makes [unintelligible] which from other [unintelligible]</div>

Gerberlb