1:92:293 - Revision history

10.5.32.73 at 15:30, 22 August 2024

2024-08-22T15:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 22 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	doubtless like to be removed west again in ~~[ineligible]~~ of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - ~~for~~ the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs ~~[ineligible]~~ to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such ~~approved~~ obligation. The fact is, all these Indians ~~referred each~~ year to remove except those who ~~merit~~. all had the offer and by hiding and ~~[ineligible]~~ out of the ~~[ineligible]~~ they could not be compelled to ~~so unless~~ the rest were ~~[ineligible]~~. ~~These~~ were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be justice to ~~[ineligible]~~ of the contractors to remove them west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his receipt? ", in full for his [~~ineligible~~] as physician to the Miami emigration " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was ~~setting~~ with the partners in the contracts. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return ~~form~~ the west but Judge Ewing had ~~us [ineligible]~~ to settle with him as I was the active partner in the emigration having it solely in my contract. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ~~; objects~~. Will you have the goodness to send me the ~~[ineligible]~~ you have		doubtless like to be removed west again in anticipation of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors -- but the injustice of this will be so apparent that it needs only to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such supposed obligation. The fact is, all these Indians refused last year to remove except those who went. all had the offer and by hiding and escaping out of the country they could not be compelled to go when the rest were taken. There were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment, would it be justice to require of the contractors to remove them west again?

			You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his receipt "in full for his [service] as physician to the Miami emigration "

			As [to] the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was settilng with the partners in the contracts. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return from the west but Judge Ewing had no authority to settle with him as I was the active partner in the emigration having it solely in my contract.

			I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ as superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his receipts. Will you have the goodness to send me the amount you have

Pulforba at 20:30, 5 May 2021

2021-05-05T20:30:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 5 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	doubtless like to be removed west again in [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all had the offer and by hiding and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the rest were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be justice to [ineligible] of the contractors to remove them west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his [receipt?] ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami emigration " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the [partners?] in the [contracts?]. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to [settle?] with [him?] as I was the active [partner] in the emigration having it solely in my [contract?]. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have		doubtless like to be removed west again in [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all had the offer and by hiding and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the rest were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be justice to [ineligible] of the contractors to remove them west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his receipt? ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami emigration " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the partners in the contracts. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to settle with him as I was the active partner in the emigration having it solely in my contract. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have

Pulforba at 19:49, 5 May 2021

2021-05-05T19:49:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 5 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	doubtless like to be removed west again in ~~anti~~ [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all ~~[ineligible]~~ the offer and ~~[ineligible]~~ and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the ~~merit~~ were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be ~~[ineligible]~~ [ineligible] of the contractors to remove ~~three~~ west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his [receipt?] ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami ~~emigrateion~~ " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the [partners?] in the [contracts?]. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to [settle?] with [him?] as I was the active [partner] in the emigration having it solely in my [contract?]. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have		doubtless like to be removed west again in [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all had the offer and by hiding and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the rest were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be justice to [ineligible] of the contractors to remove them west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his [receipt?] ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami emigration " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the [partners?] in the [contracts?]. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to [settle?] with [him?] as I was the active [partner] in the emigration having it solely in my [contract?]. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have

Shrivecm1 at 20:04, 4 May 2021

2021-05-04T20:04:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 4 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[ineligible] [ineligible]~~ to be removed west again in anti [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the ~~extreme~~ of the ~~[ineligible]~~ - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be ~~[ineligible]~~ to the department to secure to the ~~[ineligible]~~ a release from any such approved obligation. The ~~[ineligible] in~~ all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all [ineligible] the offer and [ineligible] and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the merit were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be [ineligible] [ineligible] of the contractors to remove three west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the ~~[ineligible]~~ of the emigration has yet to be settled paid ~~[ineligible] [ineligible]~~ the balance retained by the government on the ~~[ineligible]~~. I settled with the ~~[ineligible]~~ and have his [~~ineligible~~] ", in full for his [ineligible] as ~~[ineligible]~~ to the Miami ~~emigrate's~~ " As the settlement with ~~that [ineligible] [ineligible]~~ say ~~[ineligible]~~ not yet settled with him, because he was ~~about [ineligible] [ineligible] [ineligible]~~ the ~~[ineligible] [ineligible]~~ setting with the [~~ineligible~~] in the [~~ineligible~~]. [ineligible], he called on judge ~~[ineligible]~~ for a settlement on the return form the west ~~[ineligible] in [ineligible] [ineligible]~~ had us [ineligible] to [~~ineligible~~] with [~~ineligible~~] as I was the active [~~ineligible~~] in the emigration ~~[ineligible]~~ it ~~sole~~ in [~~ineligible] [ineligible~~]. I paid ~~only [ineligible]~~ 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. ~~[ineligible]~~ you have the ~~for [ineligible]~~ to send me the [ineligible] you have		doubtless like to be removed west again in anti [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all [ineligible] the offer and [ineligible] and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the merit were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be [ineligible] [ineligible] of the contractors to remove three west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his [receipt?] ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami emigrateion " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the [partners?] in the [contracts?]. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to [settle?] with [him?] as I was the active [partner] in the emigration having it solely in my [contract?]. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have

Pulforba: Created page with "[ineligible] [ineligible] to be removed west again in anti [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the extreme of the [ineligible] - for the injustice..."

2021-05-01T00:18:56Z

Created page with "[ineligible] [ineligible] to be removed west again in anti [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the extreme of the [ineligible] - for the injustice..."

New page

[ineligible] [ineligible] to be removed west again in anti [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the extreme of the [ineligible] - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be [ineligible] to the department to secure to the [ineligible] a release from any such approved obligation. The [ineligible] in all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all [ineligible] the offer and [ineligible] and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the merit were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be [ineligible] [ineligible] of the contractors to remove three west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the [ineligible] of the emigration has yet to be settled paid [ineligible] [ineligible] the balance retained by the government on the [ineligible]. I settled with the [ineligible] and have his [ineligible] ", in full for his [ineligible] as [ineligible] to the Miami emigrate's " As the settlement with that [ineligible] [ineligible] say [ineligible] not yet settled with him, because he was about [ineligible] [ineligible] [ineligible] the [ineligible] [ineligible] setting with the [ineligible] in the [ineligible]. [ineligible], he called on judge [ineligible] for a settlement on the return form the west [ineligible] in [ineligible] [ineligible] had us [ineligible] to [ineligible] with [ineligible] as I was the active [ineligible] in the emigration [ineligible] it sole in [ineligible] [ineligible]. I paid only [ineligible] 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. [ineligible] you have the for [ineligible] to send me the [ineligible] you have