1:109:381: Difference between revisions

From MyaamiaRemoval
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dorngj (talk | contribs)
Created page with "January 1847"
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
January 1847
Branch Bank Fort Wayne<br>
Jany 7, 1847
 
Dr Sir
 
Your fav of the 18th ult. is recd
 
I regret that you have not considered it safe, to advise the payment of more than $35.000. on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contractors did not suppose that under any circumstances more than $10.000 would be retained, as the cost of the subsisting the Indians for one year will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is proper that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the contract, to <s>fulfil</s> secure its fulfilments.--a large amount cannot be withheld, in justice to the enterprising contractors and other parties concerned. The contractors are under heavy liability incurred in effecting the emigration which $35.000, after deducting the $15.000 to be recd by Mr. Peebles, will not meet.
 
Under these circumstances, I trust that you will deem it not inconsistent with your duty to the Government to advise the payment of a much larger sum than the one named.
 
Very Resp Yr Obt Svt<br>
H.  MCulloh [illeg]
 
Hon W Medill
Commr Indian Affairs

Latest revision as of 13:23, 28 August 2024

Branch Bank Fort Wayne
Jany 7, 1847

Dr Sir

Your fav of the 18th ult. is recd

I regret that you have not considered it safe, to advise the payment of more than $35.000. on the contract for the removal of the Miamis. The contractors did not suppose that under any circumstances more than $10.000 would be retained, as the cost of the subsisting the Indians for one year will not exceed $3000 or $6000. It is proper that you should retain enough of the money to be paid on the contract, to fulfil secure its fulfilments.--a large amount cannot be withheld, in justice to the enterprising contractors and other parties concerned. The contractors are under heavy liability incurred in effecting the emigration which $35.000, after deducting the $15.000 to be recd by Mr. Peebles, will not meet.

Under these circumstances, I trust that you will deem it not inconsistent with your duty to the Government to advise the payment of a much larger sum than the one named.

Very Resp Yr Obt Svt
H. MCulloh [illeg]

Hon W Medill Commr Indian Affairs