1:55:172: Difference between revisions

From MyaamiaRemoval
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Gerberlb (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Washington Aug 3<sub>rd</sub> 1846 Sir, Since [unintelligible] with you. I have [unintelligible] a letter from the west in which is is stated, in speaking of the approachi..."
 
Gerberlb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Sir,
Sir,
Since [unintelligible] with you. I have [unintelligible] a letter from the west in which is is stated, in speaking of the approaching emigration of the Miamis, that Col. Madill has written back [unintelligible] Sinclair threatening [unintelligible] I [unintelligible] information is [unintelligible]. I know that you have repeatedly said no force in the emigration of those people, [unintelligible] fathom the threat [unintelligible] is can do no good. They are [unintelligible] as such that, which has even [unintelligible] been [unintelligible] twice not [unintelligible]
Since [unintelligible] with you. I have [unintelligible] a letter from the west in which is is stated, in speaking of the approaching emigration of the Miamis, that Col. Madill has written back [unintelligible] Sinclair threatening [unintelligible] I [unintelligible] information is [unintelligible]. I know that you have repeatedly said no force in the emigration of those people, [unintelligible] fathom the threat [unintelligible] is can do no good. They are [unintelligible] as such that, which has even [unintelligible] been [unintelligible] twice not [unintelligible] ... result from the latter. Why is it that they [unintelligible] treated like dogs? [unintelligible] of humanity be [unintelligible] in their behalf? Often having bad [unintelligible] ... they look for protection? [unintelligible]

Revision as of 22:01, 28 April 2021

Washington Aug 3rd 1846

Sir, Since [unintelligible] with you. I have [unintelligible] a letter from the west in which is is stated, in speaking of the approaching emigration of the Miamis, that Col. Madill has written back [unintelligible] Sinclair threatening [unintelligible] I [unintelligible] information is [unintelligible]. I know that you have repeatedly said no force in the emigration of those people, [unintelligible] fathom the threat [unintelligible] is can do no good. They are [unintelligible] as such that, which has even [unintelligible] been [unintelligible] twice not [unintelligible] ... result from the latter. Why is it that they [unintelligible] treated like dogs? [unintelligible] of humanity be [unintelligible] in their behalf? Often having bad [unintelligible] ... they look for protection? [unintelligible]